Goal Layer (GSA)¶
Translating Direction into Intentional Goals
Purpose¶
The Goal Layer exists to translate life direction into structured intent.
It answers the question:
What goals should exist if I am serious about the direction I've chosen?
This layer is where vague vision becomes concrete enough to reason about, but not yet concrete enough to execute.
If the Direction Layer answers why, the Goal Layer answers what.
What a Goal Is in This System¶
A goal is not a task. A goal is not a project plan. A goal is not a metric.
A goal is:
- A meaningful end state
- Aligned with identity and life direction
- Expressed clearly enough to evaluate progress
- Stable enough to guide decisions over time
Goals give shape and boundaries to effort.
The GSA Framework¶
Every goal must be defined using GSA:
flowchart TB
subgraph gsa ["GSA FRAMEWORK"]
G["<b>GOAL</b><br/>Clear end-state<br/><i>What reality looks like when achieved</i>"]
S["<b>STRATEGY</b><br/>Principles & approaches<br/><i>How you will approach it</i>"]
A["<b>ACTIONS</b><br/>Scope of effort<br/><i>What kinds of work are involved</i>"]
end
G --> S --> A
A -.->|"Feeds"| OUT["Outcomes Layer"]
style G fill:#7c4dff,stroke:#5e35b1,color:#fff
style S fill:#536dfe,stroke:#3d5afe,color:#fff
style A fill:#448aff,stroke:#2979ff,color:#fff
style OUT fill:#00bcd4,stroke:#00acc1,color:#fff
style gsa fill:#ede7f6,stroke:#7c4dff
GOAL¶
A clear end-state written as if it already exists.
The GOAL statement:
- Is specific but not tactical
- Describes reality, not effort
- Can be recognized as true or false
Examples
Bad: "Get healthier" or "Improve my career"
Good: "I live an active lifestyle with consistent movement and high energy." or "I work in a role that leverages my technical skills and supports autonomy."
STRATEGY¶
The strategy defines how you intend to approach the goal, at a high level.
Strategy:
- Describes principles and approaches
- Does not list steps
- Is resilient to change
- Guides decision-making
Good strategies survive schedule changes.
ACTIONS¶
Actions define the scope of effort, not execution.
Actions:
- Identify what kinds of things must happen
- Create boundaries around the goal
- Prevent under- and over-scoping
Actions do not become tasks directly. They become inputs to outcome design.
Why GSA Is a Middle Layer¶
GSA sits intentionally between narrative direction and concrete execution.
This prevents two common failures:
- Staying abstract forever
- Jumping straight to tasks
GSA creates a thinking buffer.
Goal Quality Standards¶
A high-quality goal:
- Is clearly downstream of direction
- Has an obvious "done" state
- Can be supported by multiple outcomes
- Does not require perfect execution to succeed
- Feels meaningful even when progress is slow
If a goal only feels good when you are "on track," it is fragile.
Goals vs Outcomes (Critical Distinction)¶
| Goals | Outcomes |
|---|---|
| Aspirational | Concrete |
| Few in number | Multiple per goal |
| Higher altitude | Time-bound |
| Do not live in task systems | Live in the task system |
If you try to track goals directly, you will overcomplicate execution.
Pillars and Goal Density¶
Goals should usually map to one of the core pillars: Finance, Career, Health, Relationships.
flowchart TB
subgraph pillars ["THE FOUR PILLARS"]
P1["<b>FINANCE</b><br/>Money, investments<br/>financial security"]
P2["<b>CAREER</b><br/>Work, skills<br/>professional growth"]
P3["<b>HEALTH</b><br/>Physical, mental<br/>energy, sustainability"]
P4["<b>RELATIONSHIPS</b><br/>Family, friends<br/>community, connection"]
end
style P1 fill:#66bb6a,stroke:#43a047,color:#fff
style P2 fill:#42a5f5,stroke:#1e88e5,color:#fff
style P3 fill:#ef5350,stroke:#e53935,color:#fff
style P4 fill:#ab47bc,stroke:#8e24aa,color:#fff
style pillars fill:#fafafa,stroke:#bdbdbd
Rules:
- Fewer goals per pillar is better
- Too many goals in one pillar creates dilution
- Goals should not compete for the same energy
This system favors depth over breadth.
Goal Decay and Retirement¶
Not all goals are meant to last forever.
A goal should be retired when:
- Direction changes
- Identity evolves
- The goal has served its purpose
- The goal no longer feels meaningful
Retiring a goal is success, not failure.
Anti-Patterns This Layer Prevents¶
- Setting goals to impress others
- Measuring worth through progress
- Treating goals as obligations
- Goal hopping without reflection
- Overloading life with simultaneous goals
Output of the Goal Layer¶
The valid outputs of this layer are:
- A small set of active goals
- Each defined by GSA
- Each clearly aligned with direction
These outputs feed the Outcome Layer.
Review Cadence¶
Goals should be reviewed:
- Quarterly (alignment check)
- Annually (deep review)
- When energy or motivation collapses
Review questions:
- Does this goal still serve my direction?
- Is this goal still worth its cost?
- Would I choose this goal again today?
Diagnostic Question¶
If execution feels heavy, ask:
"Is this an execution problem, or is the goal misaligned?"
Many execution problems are actually goal problems.
Closing¶
Goals are not commitments. They are intentional declarations.
They exist to give your effort meaning, not to demand constant proof of progress.
When goals are well-formed, execution can remain light.